Link to full text for
The Times article:
https://archive.ph/sB8A7
News of talks and a wishlist of airlines and destinations is kind of what we heard from his predecessor - and most of it it went absolutely nowhere. We've heard this all before, they actually need to actually produce results this time.
Surely very significant investment has to be put into attracting airlines as much as improving and enlarging a terminal that's already operating well under capacity. However, it seems like there are very concrete plans and funding for the terminal, but funding for incentives and routes development seems significantly less defined.
Wrt to turnaround times, given that a number of other UK airports with demonstrably worse avg delays like MAN and EDI are FR bases and GLA is not, I'm not particularly convinced that reducing them is going to make a critical difference in GLA's favor tbh. It's surely all about making charges as low as possible, so hopefully some of the investment is going to go to that.
FlyGLA wrote: ↑Wed Apr 23, 2025 1:33 pm
The target of reaching 10 million passengers within three years is music to my ears. It might sound bold, but in reality, GLA should already be operating above that level. Let’s not forget, upwards of 2 to 3 million passengers a year are currently being lost down the M8. This isn’t about building a market from scratch, it’s about reclaiming an existing one that’s already there and ready to fly from Glasgow.
Exactly, they can build numbers significantly just by repatriating passengers from EDI, and that can be done without single extra holidaymaker, tourist or biz traveller having to actually travel to or from the GLA catchment.
I think getting to 10m pax would require about 7% growth for the next three years, so they're going to have to get going on that. Indeed, given currently announced routes, 8.5 million in 2025 seems a little bit ambitious.