They are taxpayers like us, so if it’s coming out of our pockets it’s coming out of theirs too.Clive wrote: ↑Tue Feb 23, 2021 10:18 pm [quote=atuk post_id=3245 time=<a href="tel:1614117939">1614117939</a> user_id=75]
New bidder in the frame. No surprise yet again unnamed company but looks likely that the £43m will be written off.
Shades of BiFab, Fergusson Marine: when oh when will the hard pressed tax payer be given value for money? I often wonder if the largesse shown by politicians with our funds would be so generous if it came from their own pockets.
The sale price hasn’t been revealed yet so we don’t know how much the public purse will get back.
https://www.scotsman.com/news/transport ... rt-3144342
Personally I’m more interested to know what plans the buyers have for the airport and if they are going to close the terminal pax ops.
All three of the companies you mentioned have been saved from certain closure. Most people would think that’s better than closure.
[/quote]
I’d disagree regards saved from closure. Perhaps hanging b a thread may be a better description. Anyway back to PIK.
Why the secrecy? If PIK was a plc then Company officials would have to declare details to the London Stock Exchange; this is the law.
I would like to see the same largesse applied to PIK be given to AGS and GIP: at least in time, preparing sustainable business plans for recovery and protecting jobs and employment prospects.
All we have is smoke and mirrors, again, and everything in the toy box thrown out to help at two bit player in a second rate poker game.